Unilateral or Bilateral Cerebral Perfusion in Hemiarch Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background

We designed a prospective randomized clinical study to compare unilateral and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) under moderate hypethermia in open distal aortic hemiarch replacement in ascending aortic aneurysm.

Methods

Forty‐two patients were prospectively randomized into two groups; unilateral ACP to Group 1 and bilateral ACP to Group 2. Inclusion criteria were pathological aortic aneurysm in the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch, elective operation, normal preoperative carotid Doppler ultrasonography, and nonexistence of preoperative neurological event. Patients were evaluated with preoperative and postoperative biochemical blood analysis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neurological disorders. The primary endpoints were permanent neurological disorder and death.

Results

There were 21 patients in each group. Mean age was 56.57 ± 10.06 years in Group 1 and 50.95 ± 15.64 years in Group 2 (p = .170). No significant difference was found according to demographic data. ACP times were significantly higher in bilateral ACP (Group 1: 12.62 ± 5.04 min, Group 2: 18.23 ± 9.04 min, p = .018) whereas cross‐clamp time and cardiopulmonary bypass times were not (p = .693 and p = .584 sequentially). Transient neurological disorder was found in seven patients in Group 1 and in 4 patients in Group 2 (p = .484). Postoperative MRI revealed new milimetric ischemic zones in three patients in Group 1 but none in Group 2. No permanent neurological disorder or mortality was seen.

Conclusion

The present randomized clinical prospective study could not prove the superiority of one of the technique in cerebral protection probably because, our overall ACP time was too short.