The Long-Term Impact of Peripheral Cannulation for Redo Cardiac Surgery
Background
Redo cardiac surgery carries an inherent risk for adverse short‐term outcomes and worse long‐term survival. Strategies to mitigate these risks have been numerous, including initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass via peripheral cannulation before resternotomy. This study evaluated the impact of central versus peripheral cannulation on long‐term survival after redo cardiac surgery.
Methods
This was an observational study of open cardiac surgeries between 2010 and 2018. Patients undergoing open cardiac surgery that utilized cardiopulmonary bypass, who also had more than equal to 1 prior cardiac surgery, were identified. Kaplan‐Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the impact of peripheral cannulation on survival. To isolate long‐term survival, patients with operative mortality were excluded and survival time was counted from the date of discharge until the date of death.
Results
Of the 1660 patients with more than equal to 1 prior cardiac surgery, 91 (5.5%) received peripheral cannulation. After excluding patients with operative mortality and after multivariable risk‐adjustment, the peripheral cannulation group had significantly increased hazard of death, as compared to the central cannulation group (HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.30, P = .044). Yet, there were no relevant differences for other postoperative outcomes, including blood product requirement, prolonged ventilation (>24 hours), pneumonia, reoperation for bleeding, stroke, sepsis, and new dialysis requirement.
Conclusions
This is the first study reporting the long‐term impact of peripheral cannulation for redo cardiac surgery after excluding patients with operative mortality. These data suggest that central cannulation may to be the preferred approach to redo cardiac surgery whenever safe and possible.
