Intraoperative Autologous Blood Donation Leads to Fewer Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e630/2e6304e6e041780d808f33f418d91538dece380b" alt=""
Background
Blood conservation with antifibrinolytics, topical hemostatics, and strict transfusion triggers are becoming commonplace in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a blood conservation protocol centering on standardized IAD use in cardiac surgery.
Methods
We reviewed patient charts who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital over an 8 year period to analyze transfusion tendencies before and after a new blood conservaton policy was implemented. Propensity score matching was employed to account for population differences in preoperative and perioperative covariates.
Results
1002 patients were studied over an 8-year period (January 2009-December 2017). 352 patients prior to the new blood conservation policy (Group 1) were compared to 650 patients following the change (Group 2). Fewer Group 2 patients required blood transfusions during their hospital stay (78% vs 61%, p < 0.001), were transfused fewer units (2.8 vs 1.81 units, p < 0.001), and experienced a shorter length of stay (8.02 vs 7.28 days, p = 0.012). Propensity score matched cohorts revealed reductions in any complication (29.5% vs 18.8%, p = 0.007), fewer post-operative transfusions (70.1% vs 50.9%, p < 0.0001), and a lower transfusion volume (1.82 vs 1.21 units, p = 0.0015) associated with IAD without any associated change in mortality.
Conclusions
IAD use is associated with reduced transfusions in cardiac surgery, and may be considered a complementary aspect of blood conservation. Our experience suggests it may be applied with few limitations. A causal relationship between IAD and outcomes should be established with prospective studies.