Evaluation of Point-of-Care ACT Coagulometers and Anti-Xa Activity During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

The activated clotting time (ACT) is used worldwide to confirm safe heparin anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. For the present study, the performances of 2 commonly used ACT devices were compared with each other and with anti-Xa levels throughout the surgical procedure in order to understand whether they can be used interchangeably.

Prospective study.

Tertiary care center.

The study comprised 33 elective adult cardiac surgical patients.

Blood samples were taken at standard times throughout the surgery (after induction, after heparin bolus, 4 samples at 30-minute intervals during cardiopulmonary bypass, after protamine), and ACTs and anti-Xa levels were analyzed. Data were compared using receiver operating characteristics and LOESS regression.

The correlation between anti-Xa levels and the Hemochron ACT (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA) was acceptable (r = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.757-0.868; p < 0.0001), as was the correlation between anti-Xa levels and the i-STAT (Abbott Point of Care, Abbott Park, IL) (r = 0.81, 95% CI 0.738-0.858; p < 0.0001). The correlation between the 2 ACT methods was poorer (r = 0.77, 95% CI 0.707-0.828; p < 0.0001) than their correlation to anti-Xa levels. When compared with anti-Xa levels, the sensitivity and specificity were mediocre for both devices, although the i-STAT performed better than the Hemochron ACT. The Hemochron ACT read higher values than the i-STAT ACT throughout the course of the surgery.

The correlation between the Hemochron ACT and i-STAT ACT is moderate, and they have different sensitivity and specificity when compared with anti-Xa levels. This suggests that ACT devices should not be used interchangeably, but cut-off values for safe anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass should be determined for each type of device, particularly when switching supplier.