A Retrospective Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Versus Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients: A Single Surgeon Analysis
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations using either minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) or conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) in patients requiring emergency CABG with regard to the perioperative course and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE).
